Thoughts on planning system

Home » Latest News » Thoughts on planning system

On the 30th April this year, Greg Mulholland MP introduced a bill, under the ten minute rule, for amendment of the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF).

It is sponsored by MPs from all three major parties, and addresses a number of issues that affect local rural communities.

The Bill will now receive a second hearing on 6th June 2014, this Friday. This Bill, which enjoys cross-party support, will address some of the issues that have angered and frustrated many affected by the flood of major planning applications, many by speculative developers, since the inception of the NPPF.

The acronym NIMBY was popularised by Nicholas Ridley, Secretary of State for the Environment in the late 80s, who turned out to be one of the first. Nowadays the term is exploited by politicians and developers as a means of dismissing local people who object to contentious developments on green spaces.

But what if groups like The National Trust, Civic Voice, The Campaign for the Protection of Rural England and the recently formed Community Voice on Planning, who together represent the views of many many millions of people across the country, object to the very same thing?

Many think that the NPPF may not be working in the anticipated way. In particular, that the local voice is not being heard and that this is a cause of resentment, especially in rural communities.

The Bill urges Government to:

  • Recognise that there are serious short-comings to the definition of 'sustainability' in current use and amend the NPPF and the guidance accordingly to give greater weight to heritage, ecology, transport and culture.
  • Do more to ensure that development is preferred and prioritised on brownfield and city sites.
  • Do more to protect green areas of special value to local areas.
  • Scrap the current 5 year supply definition and allow permissions to be counted as part of this.
  • Accept that the expectations for the production of Local Plans in the allotted time-scale were unrealistic and allow a further period of grace to those local authorities that are still struggling to achieve this.
  • Seriously consider the short-comings of building-by-numbers

popular recent storiesAlso in the news

Village centre
Fri 31 Jul 6:10am  |  hits: 1,481

Ed: We received this from local resident Geoff Farr. AudlemOnline invited John Lewis Customer Services to respond on 27/07/20 but have not received a responseYou have been warned26th July 2020Some of you may know that I have been very recently widowed.It therefore follows that my only evening companion is my television.My children and grandchildren have urged me to modernise and...

Cheshire East
Wed 05 Aug 6:08am  |  hits: 1,384

Delivery of homes in Cheshire East reaches new highMore than 3,000 new homes were built in Cheshire East in the last financial year -- which is likely to put the borough among the highest performing areas in the country for house-building investment again.From April 2019 to the end of March this year, 3,065 additional new homes were built in Cheshire East. This is 1,265 above the annual...

Adderley Path
Sun 02 Aug 6:10am  |  hits: 1,001

It's crunch time as the application to reinstate the paths to Adderley goes to the Planning Inspectorate.Two historic paths to Adderley from Bagley Lane were closed at the Shropshire border in the 1950's by the machinations of the owner of most of Adderley parish, Lord Corbet. "There are no public paths in Adderley." he was heard to say at the time. Finally, the official...