Thoughts on planning system

Home » Latest News » Thoughts on planning system

On the 30th April this year, Greg Mulholland MP introduced a bill, under the ten minute rule, for amendment of the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF).

It is sponsored by MPs from all three major parties, and addresses a number of issues that affect local rural communities.

The Bill will now receive a second hearing on 6th June 2014, this Friday. This Bill, which enjoys cross-party support, will address some of the issues that have angered and frustrated many affected by the flood of major planning applications, many by speculative developers, since the inception of the NPPF.

The acronym NIMBY was popularised by Nicholas Ridley, Secretary of State for the Environment in the late 80s, who turned out to be one of the first. Nowadays the term is exploited by politicians and developers as a means of dismissing local people who object to contentious developments on green spaces.

But what if groups like The National Trust, Civic Voice, The Campaign for the Protection of Rural England and the recently formed Community Voice on Planning, who together represent the views of many many millions of people across the country, object to the very same thing?

Many think that the NPPF may not be working in the anticipated way. In particular, that the local voice is not being heard and that this is a cause of resentment, especially in rural communities.

The Bill urges Government to:

  • Recognise that there are serious short-comings to the definition of 'sustainability' in current use and amend the NPPF and the guidance accordingly to give greater weight to heritage, ecology, transport and culture.
  • Do more to ensure that development is preferred and prioritised on brownfield and city sites.
  • Do more to protect green areas of special value to local areas.
  • Scrap the current 5 year supply definition and allow permissions to be counted as part of this.
  • Accept that the expectations for the production of Local Plans in the allotted time-scale were unrealistic and allow a further period of grace to those local authorities that are still struggling to achieve this.
  • Seriously consider the short-comings of building-by-numbers

popular recent storiesAlso in the news

Village centre
Mon 25 May 6:07am  |  hits: 1,491

From Emma OmerjiHi, I'm researching my family tree and believe that my great great grandmother is mentioned in an article dated 25th Aug 2014 by Peter Brown on the deaths on the Triple tragedy at Audlem.You can see this article here.Her name was Annie Boswell. I've been trying to find where I can get a...

Williams' Newsagents, Audlem Square
Wed 27 May 6:08am  |  hits: 1,453

Nigel Mottershead sent the following message to audlemOnlineWe found what looks like an expensive branded dog harness on the footpath close to our house a couple of weeks ago.We hung it prominently on the stile but no one has claimed it so far.Yesterday we took it to Williams Newsagents and I told Judy that we would post something on AoL about it.Judy and her staff are aware they have...

Charity Shop Sales Easter Monday
Sun 31 May 6:09am  |  hits: 1,292

Sundays at 32 Windmill DriveThere will be a plant sale in aid of Audlem Charity Shop on Sundays from 2pm at 32 Windmill Drive, for the foreseeable future.All proceeds to the shop.We have minimal income currently so any sales are very welcome.Please observe social distancing when you come.Many thanks.Karen...