By Audlem Webteam - 1st May 2006 7:23am
On Friday we published an email from a resident asking if Audlem Online would consider 'naming and shaming' people. The question arose from a 'pooper scooper' story we ran about a un-named but less than responsible dog owner walking his pet along the canal. The question has, however, had the webteam asking themselves should we consider 'naming and shaming' if it is in the community's good.
The team's view is 'no', indeed a resounding 'no'. That is not the role of the village website. There are many authorities that take on these responsibilities including, in more serious cases, the police. And that's where the responsibility should remain. It was a fair question to ask and we understand the frustration that lay behind it, but, as one webteam member put it- "Audlem Online is informative and lighthearted — even funny at times — and it should stay like that."
We hope you agree.
popular recent storiesAlso in the news
DaveMThe first picture at Lock 11 declares the canal closed. The second below Adderley Locks shows why — Two big dams in place so a culvert can be repaired.Jean StainthorpeThe Turnpike field is under a significant amount of water again, but Grey's Bridge should stay put this time after the repair work undertaken by cheshire East.Christopher...
Ed: We received this from our roving reporter Bob Fousert. It would be great if the Parish Council could intervene with the Royal Mail to undo this restriction of trade thoughtlessly implemented.What do you call a post box where the mail you want to post doesn't fit through the slot? Answer- a box.Imagine your frustration when the postal service you rely upon for a significant...
We've found a small black dog on Paddock Lane, collar but no tags.It has run off over the field — hopefully it finds it's way...
Friday 21st Feb
Thursday 20th Feb
Methodist Meeting Rooms
Audlem Methodist Church